By Abdiqani Haji Abdi
In the ever-evolving political landscape of Somalia, Puntland stands at a critical crossroads. As a relatively stable and semi-autonomous region in the northeastern part of the country, Puntland has enjoyed a certain level of independence, yet it continues to be part of the Federal Government of Somalia.
However, as tensions between the federal government and the federal member states (FMS) rise, particularly over governance, security, and economic disparity, the question of Puntland’s future looms large: should Puntland continue its affiliation with the central government or follow in the footsteps of Somaliland and declare full independence?
The Growing Rift with the FGS
Puntland’s growing frustration with the Federal Government stems largely from the latter’s blatant disregard for the Provisional Federal Constitution (PFC) and Somalia’s laws, a unadulterated contrast to Puntland’s commitment to the rule of law. As Somalia’s oldest federal member state, established in 1998, Puntland has been the cornerstone of federalism in the country, spearheading the adoption of a federal system of governance.
While Puntland has made significant progress in security, governance, and economic development, the southern Federal Member States, including Mogadishu, remain marred by instability, weak governance, public land grabbing, corruption, nepotism, and the pervasive threat of Al-Shabaab. This unambiguous disparity has fueled resentment among Puntland’s leadership and citizens, who feel their state is being dragged down by the central government’s failure to address the chronic dysfunction in the south.
Although public services have not yet reached all regions of Puntland, and significant challenges and shortcomings persist, it is important to acknowledge the considerable progress that has been made. Unlike the southern regions, Puntland has cultivated stability, prioritized institutional capacity-building, and created economic opportunities. It boasts a functioning Government Bank, a State Auditor’s Office led by a certified chartered accountant with extensive local and international experience, and a fully operational State Constitutional Court. In contrast, the FGS Auditor’s Office is reportedly headed by an unqualified individual with no relevant expertise, and the FGS has failed to establish a Constitutional Court even after a decade.
Puntland’s leadership and people view these disparities as evidence of the federal government’s incompetence and corruption, aggravating their frustration and widening the rift within Somalia’s federal system. Despite its successes, Puntland is continually forced to contend with an ineffective FGS that not only fails to support the FMS but also undermines their progress through neglect and mismanagement.
The Somaliland Model
Puntland’s situation increasingly mirrors that of Somaliland, which declared secession in 1991 after the collapse of Somalia’s central government. Although Somaliland has yet to gain international recognition, it has established a stable and functional administration, outperforming southern regions in security, governance, and development. This success has sparked debate among Puntland’s leaders and citizens, some of whom question why they should remain part of a Somali government that has consistently failed to address their state’s needs.
For years, Puntland has maintained significant autonomy within Somalia’s federal framework, with its own president, parliament, security forces, and robust civilian institutions. Its leadership has played a pivotal role in fostering stability among the federal member states (FMS). However, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) continues to cut the fragile bonds holding the federal system together, worsening internal divisions and jeopardizing national unity.
The absence of an independent and functioning Federal Parliament, along with a lack of consultation on critical issues such as the Constitution, electoral laws, political party regulations, the National Electoral Committee, and equitable distribution of power and resources, has deepened Puntland’s disillusionment. Furthermore, the unconstitutional extension of southern FMS presidents’ mandates has only added to Puntland’s grievances, placing immense pressure on its leadership to re-evaluate its position within Somalia’s crumbling federal framework.
As these issues persist, Puntland faces a critical decision: whether to continue advocating for meaningful federalism or to chart its own course, much like Somaliland, in pursuit of stability, development, and self-determination.
Federal Government’s Attempts to Undermine Puntland
Over three successive administrations, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has faced persistent accusations of deliberately sabotaging Puntland’s progress instead of focusing on fostering equitable national development. This alleged campaign, described as systematic and relentless, appears aimed at destabilizing Puntland and undermining its political and economic achievements, reducing it to the struggling status of many southern federal member states.
A glaring manifestation of this undermining effort is the FGS’s consistent withholding of international funds earmarked for Puntland’s development, budget support, and institutional strengthening. These funds, provided by international donors, are critical for implementing infrastructure projects, improving public services, and maintaining regional stability. Rather than facilitating their timely transfer, the FGS weaponized and obstructs these resources, using them as a tool for coercion to secure political concessions from Puntland’s leadership.
This practice has far-reaching consequences, effectively crippling Puntland’s ability to pursue its development agenda, sustain its governance structures, and maintain autonomy. The withholding of funds has stalled crucial projects, weakened essential public services, and strained Puntland’s relations with the FGS. These actions not only impair mistrust between the central government and Puntland but also deepen Somalia’s ongoing political fragmentation.
Moreover, this pattern reflects broader concerns about the centralization of power by the FGS, which critics argue comes at the expense of federalism and regional self-reliance. Puntland, often considered a model of stability and governance compared to other federal member states, has become a target for this political strategy. The implications extend beyond Puntland, raising alarm about the future of federalism and equitable resource allocation in Somalia.
Ultimately, this deliberate obstruction of Puntland’s development undermines not just the region but Somalia’s collective progress, further establishing divisions and prolonging the country’s instability.
The Case for Independence
Advocates for Puntland’s independence increasingly question the merit of remaining part of a federal system that actively undermines their progress. Independence, they argue, would free Puntland from the Federal Government’s interference, enabling it to fully harness its potential and chart a brighter future. They highlight Puntland’s relative stability compared to the south, asserting that an independent Puntland would be better positioned to tackle its economic and security challenges without being weighed down by the dysfunction of the Somali state.
Puntland’s natural resources, including untapped oil reserves, and its strategic coastal position offer a strong economic foundation for self-reliance. Proponents also emphasize that Puntland has already built the key institutions required for self-governance. With its own security forces, parliamentary system, and functioning judiciary, Puntland has proven its ability to operate independently of the FGS.
This capacity for self-governance, combined with the federal government’s corruption and inability to secure other regions, has led many to view Puntland’s leadership as a model for effective governance. Independence, they argue, would allow Puntland to fully realize this potential, offering its people a stable and prosperous future outside Somalia’s troubled national framework.
The Risks of Independence
The path to independence is fraught with challenges. While Puntland enjoys relative stability, achieving international recognition would be an uphill battle, as the global community remains committed to Somalia’s territorial integrity. A unilateral declaration of independence could trigger clan territorial, a strong backlash from Mogadishu and potentially may strain relations with some neighboring countries.
Internally, Puntland would need to safeguard its cohesion. Although the region is relatively unified, existing political divisions could deepen without the federal framework, risking internal factionalism. Additionally, longstanding territorial disputes with Somaliland, particularly over the contested Sool and Sanaag regions, could escalate into conflict, threatening regional stability if not managed through proactive dialogue and negotiation.
A Delicate Balance
Puntland’s decision is complex, balancing the desire for self-determination with the realities of independence. While the frustrations with the federal government are valid, the political, economic, and diplomatic challenges of breaking away are significant.
Puntland must carefully evaluate whether the potential benefits of independence outweigh the risks, especially in the absence of a stable national government. Alternatively, it could seek greater autonomy within the federal framework, addressing its grievances while contributing to a more functional Somalia.
Whatever path Puntland chooses, its decision will have profound implications, not just for its future but for the stability and unity of Somalia as a whole.
Conclusion
Puntland stands at a critical crossroads, where its decision will shape not only its own future but also the political dynamics of Somalia as a whole. The region is caught between two contrasting paths: remaining within the federal system and pushing for greater autonomy or following Somaliland’s example by declaring independence. Each option carries its own set of consequences and challenges, making the decision particularly difficult.
Remaining within the federal framework would allow Puntland to preserve its ties with Southern Somalia, continuing its role as one of the key federal member states. However, this path would require navigating the complex political landscape where the Federal Government’s actions often undermine Puntland’s progress. Given the frustration with the current government’s inability to address key issues, particularly in the southern regions, Puntland’s leadership may find it increasingly difficult to reconcile its aspirations for autonomy with the central government’s interference.
On the other hand, pursuing independence, like Somaliland, offers the promise of full self-governance and the ability to control its own destiny. Puntland has already established many of the institutions necessary for self-rule, including its own security forces, a functioning government, and institutional capacity. The region’s relative stability and economic potential, particularly with access to natural resources like oil and its strategic coastal position, make independence a tempting prospect. However, the path to independence is fraught with challenges. The international community remains largely committed to Somalia’s territorial integrity, and Puntland would likely face significant diplomatic and economic obstacles in gaining recognition as an independent state. Additionally, there are internal political divisions and territorial disputes with neighboring Somaliland that could destabilize the region if not carefully managed.
The decision is further complicated by the reality that Puntland’s future is intertwined with the broader fate of Somalia. The central government’s dysfunction and failure to resolve the challenges in the south have deepened Puntland’s frustrations, yet Puntland’s leadership recognizes that their choices could either reinforce Somalia’s federal system or deal a fatal blow to it. A move toward independence could further fragment the nation and threaten its already fragile unity. Alternatively, remaining in the federation would require Puntland to continue pushing for reform, a process that could take years, if not decades, to bear fruit.
Ultimately, Puntland’s leadership must strike a delicate balance between regional aspirations and the political and economic risks of each path. The stakes are high, and the decision will have deep and lasting consequences for the people of Puntland and the future of Somalia. It will require careful consideration of both the immediate benefits of autonomy and the long-term risks associated with independence, while also factoring in the broader geopolitical dynamics and the prospects for national unity.
Abdiqani Haji Abdi
Email: Hajiabdi0128@gmail.com
————–
Related Article
Villa Somalia is pushing a dangerous sectarian agenda against Puntland By Prof Hassan Keynan
Puntland to operate independently from somalia after law change By Bloomberg
Wargeys Yar Baan Waa Hore Ka Akhriyay! W/Q Khaliil Cabdiraxmaan X. Xasan
We welcome the submission of all articles for possible publication on WardheerNews.com. WardheerNews will only consider articles sent exclusively. Please email your article today . Opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of WardheerNews.
WardheerNew’s tolerance platform is engaging with diversity of opinion, political ideology and self-expression. Tolerance is a necessary ingredient for creativity and civility.Tolerance fuels tenacity and audacity.
WardheerNews waxay tixgelin gaara siinaysaa maqaaladaha sida gaarka ah loogu soo diro ee aan lagu daabicin goobo kale. Maqaalkani wuxuu ka turjumayaa aragtida Qoraaga loomana fasiran karo tan WardheerNews.
Copyright © 2025 WardheerNews, All rights reserved
