By Mohamed Abdiqafar H. Hussein
The Somali people expected that when the Special Representative of the UN Secretary General Michael Keating came to Puntland on February 9, 2016, he would bring a new plan to advance mediation between Puntland and the federal government. However, at the end of his meeting, it became clear that he had no new proposal.

Michael Keating did not come to influence the people of Puntland to accept the 4.5 election system presented by the federal government nor did he come to give consent to the Puntland version of the 2016 election, which is based on a district ballot vote. Those who went to the various meetings attended by Michael Keating stated that they presented their views against the 4.5 system and it seemed their points were understood.
In the press conference, at the end of the international community’s representative visit to Garowe, the President of Puntland, Abdiwali Gas, said that there was no new plan from the International Community, but he added that they are now aware of the Puntland situation and more discussions are expected to take place. Others said that Michael Keating was in Garowe for fact-finding. In that conference, Michael also stated that he will go back and meet the Federal Government to continue looking for a solution.
Even though Michael Keating did not deliver what the Puntland people expected, he came out of those meetings knowing more. He was told all the reasons why the Puntland people oppose the 4.5 system including all the agreements signed by the Somali leaders, which stated that 2012 was the last time the 4.5 system would be used.
The statement read and delivered by the ex-president of Puntland, Abdirahman Faroole, also mentioned some of the articles in the constitution that were changed without consulting all of the stakeholders. Puntland politicians, whom Michael Keating met, also told him that the main reason the president wants to use the 4.5 system is to make his reelection easy.
In addition, Michael Keating was told by the elders that it does not make sense that the same president who admitted that he had failed to achieve “one person, one vote” and who also called all the other stakeholders to decide which election model is to be used in 2016, has now, all of a sudden, decided to dictate to the Somali people the use of the 4.5 system which he knows is unconstitutional, but will secure his reelection. President Hassan knows that since the parliamentarians selected through the 4.5 system are not accountable to any constituent in any district or region, that they are up for sale.
As result, the Puntland people thought that they will help Michael to make an informed decision upon his return to Mogadishu, since his decision to accept the 4.5 system was suspected to be based on the information provided to him by the president and prime minister or Nicholas Kay. It is most likely that Nicholas Kay informed him that everything in Somalia politics is on track and the only thing waiting to happen is the outcome of the Mogadishu meeting, where the final model to be used is being decided.
Upon his arrival in Mogadishu, the president and prime minister presented to him the plan they orchestrated to remain in power while stepping over all the other agreements reached and the constitution. Most likely, they explained to him that based on the information collected from four cities in the current regional states with Jowhar and Mogadishu that overwhelmingly Somalis had agreed to use the 4.5 system without mentioning that there could be more than eight other cities whose constituents would prefer not to use the 4.5 system. However, that misinformation provided to Michael Keating cannot only be blamed on the president and prime minister alone. Jubaland and Puntland leaders made it easy for the president to present his case. They entertained the president while he was putting in place all the steps needed for the international community to agree with him.
Those who follow Somali politics knew the president was up to something when he proposed that the four models being discussed by the Somali people would include the 4.5 system, even though his mandate was to move Somalia forward.
Another issue which raised an average person’s eyebrow was when the president convinced all the regional leaders to agree that data on which model is to be used in 2016 would be collected from only six cities, with the knowledge that four out of the six cities would vote for the 4.5 system. Finally, the president and prime minister were able to present the outcome of those fabricated steps to the International Community to persuade them that this 4.5 system is what the Somali people overwhelmingly want.
After the Garowe meeting, Michael Keating continued his fact-finding mission to Baidoa in the Southwestern State, and met President Sharif Hassan and others in his administration. In Baidoa, Michael acknowledged that there are differences among the Somali regional leaders about which model is to be used in 2016, but he insisted on standing by his previous decision.
Michael Keating said that the decision about which model is to be used in the 2016 election belongs to the Somalia people and that the International Community was there to support that decision. He added that even though different models were to be used for the Lower and Upper Houses, it should be considered that the international community wants Somalia to move forward. This 4.5 system is the model that the government has chosen for the Lower House. He supported that model because it is the only one that can be implemented considering the security situation in the country. The reason Michael Keating stated that he supported the president’s decision can be considered valid, but the question is: will that model work on the ground?
Since the collapse of the central government in Somalia in 1991, the government has been built based on consensus among the Somali people. Ahmed Modobe, president of Jubaland, who accepted the 4.5 system after the International Community forced him, doubted its implementation when he said he is waiting for the International Community and others to implement that system.
Based on Somali behavior, it can be said that the plan is doomed to fail. Any solution should consider the reality on the ground. The Somali people will not accept any election that is not based on the constitution agreed by all, and any amendment made to the constitution should be approved by all.
It will be hard now for the Somali people, who welcomed President Hassan when he was elected because of his promise to lead the Somali people to “one man, one vote,” to accept him again when he admitted that he had failed to accomplish the most important goal of his mandate. They will not accept the 4.5 model as long as they know that if it is accepted, President Hassan will be reelected through bribing the parliamentarians, as he did when he ousted two prime ministers in less than three years.
The Somali people know very well the dangers of a leader who thinks he is the only one who can solve Somalia’s problems.
President Hassan should not only ask others to compromise, but he should consider compromising himself to allow the Somali people to move forward, considering that the Somali people gave him a four-year term during which he has not accomplished much.
If the president does that, the Somali people are willingly to accept a new leader elected through a system where there is a level playing field. Hopefully, this time they will elect someone who will promise to focus on the mandate and will not stand for another term.
Mohamed Abdiqafar H. Hussein
Email: mohabdhus@gmail.com