By Dayib Sh. Ahmed

Trump’s December 17 speech—a 20-minute primetime address carried live by the nation’s major broadcast networks—was a spectacle of deflection and scapegoating. Instead of taking responsibility for his failures, he placed blame on Joe Biden, Somali Minnesotans, immigrants, past trade deals, and what he vaguely labeled a “corrupt system.” As at his campaign rallies, facts were irrelevant. Somali Minnesotans had nothing to do with the Epstein files, nothing to do with rising inflation, nothing to do with his broken promises, and nothing to do with his inability to govern or earn global respect —including the Nobel Peace Prize he badly needs. Yet our community was reduced to a villain for problems we did not create. Going beyond Trump’s vile words, the reality is clear: the Somali community in Minnesota is not responsible for his failures, and we refuse to be used as cover for them.

This deflection is not merely a political tactic; it is a reflection of a deeper character flaw. As New York Times opinion columnist Bret Stephens wrote on December 16, “Though I tend to think it’s usually a waste of space to devote a column to President Trump’s personality, what more is there to say about the character of this petty, hollow, squalid, overstuffed man? Sometimes the point bears stressing: We are led by the most loathsome human being ever to occupy the White House.” I agree with Stephens’ assessment, but there are moments in a nation’s life when silence is complicity and restraint mirrors surrender. This is one of those moments. Furthermore, President Donald Trump’s vile and dehumanizing rhetoric directed at Somali American citizens in Minnesota demands both condemnation and deep reflection. The question is not merely what he said, but what it reveals about the erosion of decency in American political discourse. And so we must ask: What happened to American decency in our politics?

A Diagnosis.

To answer this question, one must look at the source of this behavior. As Jonathan Martin, senior political reporter for Politico, observed in his December 4 essay, “The President Who Never Grew Up,” this behavior is not accidental or episodic; it is fundamental to Trump’s political character. Martin identifies a persistent immaturity at the core of Trump’s leadership style—one that treats cruelty as strength, humiliation as entertainment, and provocation as strategy rather than failure.

Furthermore, that diagnosis echoes the searing judgment of political columnist Thomas B. Edsall, who once wrote that peering into Trump’s mindset—the logic behind his priorities, morality, and decision-making—is “like opening up a garbage pail left out for days during a summer heat wave.” The metaphor is deliberately harsh, but it captures a deeper truth: a moral vacuum where empathy, restraint, and civic responsibility should reside.

Tragically, this moral bankruptcy was again on full display when Trump addressed the nation and chose, once more, to demean and scapegoat. He referred to people as “garbage” and falsely claimed that Somali Minnesotans had “taken over” Minnesota’s economy and “stolen billions.” These are not merely offensive statements; they are blatant lies. Somali Minnesotans are hardworking Americans who build communities and strengthen the state’s economy. Trump’s claims are cynical distortions of reality, repeated with confidence but utterly unsupported by facts. This is a deliberate misinformation designed to sow division.

For the Somali community, however, Trump’s words were not abstract insults tossed into the echo chamber of cable news. They were felt in classrooms, workplaces, mosques, and apartment buildings. They translated into fear during ICE raids, heightened suspicion at airports, bullying of children in schools, and a relentless message—both explicit and implicit—that we do not belong. This is the real cost of reckless presidential rhetoric. When a president dehumanizes, others feel licensed to harass. When he lies, institutions weaken. When he targets minorities, the social fabric tears. Words from the highest office in the land do not merely offend; they authorize cruelty. What we are witnessing is a collapse of basic decency in which history will remember not only what was said, but who remained silent in the face of it.

Beyond the Rhetoric: Words That Become Policy

Crucially, Trump’s language did not exist in isolation. It was reinforced by policies that targeted Muslim-majority countries, stigmatized refugees, and institutionalized suspicion. The so-called “Muslim ban” was not merely a legal measure; it was a moral statement—one that declared certain identities inherently suspect and certain faiths incompatible with American life.

Nowhere has this impact been more acute than in Minnesota, home to the largest Somali population in the United States, the impact was immediate and painfully personal. Families were torn apart. Elderly residents were left isolated and vulnerable in their homes. Somali Minnesotans were forced to carry passports everywhere just to prove their citizenship to ICE, living with the constant fear that a simple trip outside could turn into a nightmare. Students faced daily anxiety, worried that their education—and their futures—could be disrupted simply because of how they look and who they are. This was not merely a policy debate; it was an assault on dignity, community, and the fundamental sense of safety every citizen deserves.

Furthermore, For many of us, scenes of aggressive enforcement in Minneapolis neighborhoods evoked unsettling historical memories—moments when state power was exercised without regard for dignity, context, or consequence. When law enforcement becomes a tool of collective suspicion rather than public safety, history teaches us to be alarmed. Democracies do not collapse overnight; they erode when language normalizes exclusion and institutions enforce it.

This shift in institutional tone also sent a clear message to bad actors, and, that signal traveled quickly. In Minnesota, white supremacist groups felt emboldened, interpreting presidential rhetoric as permission rather than warning. Their activities documented by organizations such as the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Anti-Defamation League—have included the circulation of propaganda, public rallies, and attempts to establish physical footholds in the state. For Somali Americans, this was not an abstract rise in extremism but a daily disruption: harassment in neighborhoods, intimidation near mosques, and a pervasive sense of being watched and unwelcome.

This is how dangerous rhetoric becomes lived reality—not through words alone, but through the behaviors those words authorize.

The Somali Story, Resilience, Not Threat

What Trump’s rhetoric consistently ignores is the truth of who Somali Americans are. We have revitalized neighborhoods, contributed to Minnesota’s economy, and sent representatives to city halls and state legislatures. Our story in Minnesota is not one of dependency or danger; it is a story of resilience. We arrived fleeing civil war and state collapse, yet rebuilt our lives with dignity. We survived trauma without surrendering hope. We came seeking safety, opportunity, and belonging—and we honored that opportunity with perseverance, integrity, and civic commitment. This is not a threat to America it is a testament to its promise.

Ronald Reagan once captured a defining truth about the United States—one that now feels both fragile and fiercely contested. “You can go to live in France, but you can’t become a Frenchman,” he said. “You can go to live in Germany or Turkey or Japan, but you cannot become a German, a Turk, or a Japanese. But anyone from any corner of the earth can come to live in America and become an American.” It was a statement not of nostalgia but of civic faith: that American identity is not inherited through blood, but earned through belonging, law, and shared democratic commitment. When that idea is undermined from the highest office in the land, the damage is not theoretical—it is lived.

The presidency is not merely an office of power; it is a moral platform. Words spoken from the Oval Office shape norms, legitimize behavior, and define who is seen as fully American. When a president mocks or demonizes vulnerable communities, the damage extends far beyond the news cycle. It seeps into schools, workplaces, and neighborhoods. Decency is not weakness; it is the minimum requirement for leadership in a pluralistic democracy.

But this moment requires more than outrage. It demands organization, civic engagement, and moral clarity. Somali Minnesotans and all communities targeted by hate must continue to vote, run for office, tell our stories, and insist on our rightful place in the American narrative. We have done this before, and we will do it again. The Somali comeback is not a slogan; it is a historical pattern.

So we return to the question history will ask of this era; What happened to your basic decency, Mr. President? The answer will not be written by one man alone, but by how the rest of us respond whether we accept the normalization of cruelty or reaffirm that dignity, equality, and respect are non-negotiable in the American experiment. Somali Minnesotans are not going anywhere. We belong here. And no amount of vile rhetoric can erase that truth.

Dayib Sh. Ahmed
Email: Dayib0658@gmail.com
——
Dayib is a writer, political analyst and WardheerNews contributor