Mogadishu (WDN) – The Somali House of the People descended into chaos during a heated parliamentary session that exposed deep political rifts within the legislature. The disorder erupted over a controversial motion to strip MP Abiib of his parliamentary immunity and remove him from the parliament. The move triggered outrage among some law makers, leading to calls for the removal of the Speaker over what they described as a politically motivated and unconstitutional process.

The session quickly devolved into shouting matches and physical altercations among lawmakers, underscoring the intensity of the dispute and the broader political tensions gripping the country.

In an official statement, the Speaker of Parliament announced the suspension of 20 members, citing credible threats that could endanger the safety of lawmakers and compromise the integrity of parliamentary proceedings. Sources familiar with the situation suggest the decision is linked to escalating tensions within the legislature and a series of recent confrontations that have significantly strained internal cohesion and undermined efforts to maintain parliamentary unity.

Furthermore, the Speaker has formally requested the Committee on House Rules to review the situation and provide both advice and appropriate measures regarding the affected MPs. The request asks the committee to act in accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the House of the People, potentially paving the way for formal disciplinary or procedural action.

This development adds to the political volatility currently gripping Somalia, where power struggles between the executive, the federal member states, and the legislature continue to escalate. Observers warn that using security as a pretext for sidelining dissenting voices could erode democratic principles and deepen mistrust.

The House leadership has yet to clarify when or if the banned MPs will be reinstated, leaving many wondering whether this marks a short-term precaution or the beginning of a broader political crackdown. As the story unfolds, citizens and stakeholders alike are watching closely, questioning whether this decision was made purely out of security necessity—or whether it reflects deeper divisions and strategic maneuvering within the highest levels of government

WardheerNews