By Mohamed Aidarus M.

1. Introduction

Somalia is a country recovering from a three-decade-long period of lawlessness and anarchy following the collapse of its former autocratic regime, which ruled Somalia for 21 years. Fragile states like Somalia desperately need visionary leaders with unwavering commitment to rebuild fragmented Somalia and restore its sovereignty.  However, to this day, Somalia remains far from fully independent due to a mix of internal turmoil and external interference. Furthermore, the country does not exercise effective control over its entire territory, airspace or maritime zone. Compounding these challenges, the country has no true economic autonomy. Its budget is heavily dependent on foreign aid and remittances, leaving it exposed to external political leverage. In essence, due to challenges related to sovereignty and state building, one of the key factors that has left Somalia caught between a rock and a hard place is the issue of divided allegiance. To put it in another way, this includes the practice of nominating dual nationals to top government positions.

After 30 years in this status quo trap, one of the most pressing and controversial issues is the appointment of dual citizens who hail from Somalia but hold other citizenships to the highest government offices in the country including the presidency, premiership and other executive roles involving critical decision-making and sensitive areas such as intelligence and security. This practice raises questions about loyalty, national security vulnerabilities and conflict of interest.

At this critical juncture of national building, decisions regarding who is qualified to hold public office carry immense national weight and far-reaching consequences. While the Somali diaspora has heavily invested in local development, the question of whether dual citizens should be entrusted with Somalia’s top leadership roles remains contentious.

This piece will answer these questions by examining real-world cases where dual nationals holding government posts have been implicated in espionage or conflicts of interests that undermined the sovereignty of the countries they served. By analyzing these examples, it will shed light on the national security, accountability, and governance risks associated with appointing dual citizens to sensitive leadership positions. Finally, it will offer practical policy recommendations to resolve these challenges and reinforce Somalia’s governance and national sovereignty.

Dual Citizenship: A Hidden Security Threat

People in high-ranking government positions hold the keys to classified information, shape strategic decisions, and steer policies that can make or break national security. When push comes to shove, if a dual citizen sits in such a role, the risk of foreign influence, manipulation, or divided priorities becomes all too real.

One of the most notable cases that stands out is that of Hamid Ghassemi-Shall, an Iranian-Canadian scientist deeply entangled in Iran’s nuclear projects. In 2008, he was arrested by Iranian authorities on charges of espionage.  He was accused of leaking sensitive nuclear information to Canada and Western intelligence agencies.

Another high-profile case involves Ali Reza Asgari, a former Iranian Deputy Minister of Defense and senior official within the Revolutionary Guard. Although officially an Iranian citizen, he was reported to have ties with Israel and the US.  While serving in his ministerial role, he suddenly jumped ship and defected to the West. This unexpected move sent shockwaves through Iran’s government, seriously undermining national security and stirring up heated debates about sovereignty and trust within the highest levels of government.

While Iran presents one notable case, it is by no means the only one worth examining: here’s another striking example. In the United States, the infamous espionage case of Aldrich Ames stands out. Ames, a trusted CIA officer, stabbed his country in the back by spying for the Soviet Union from 1986 until his arrest in 1994, all while holding both U.S. and Russian citizenship. His betrayal dealt a heavy blow to American intelligence operations and served as a wake-up call about how divided loyalties can put national security in jeopardy. 

Against this backdrop, in sensitive areas such as military, intelligence, or diplomatic affairs, Somalia must safeguard its sovereignty by ensuring its leaders are not tied down by foreign obligations or exposed to protentional pressure from other states through their second citizenship.

3. Undivided Loyalty and weak accountability

At the heart of national leadership is a simple but profound principle: a leader must owe complete and undivided loyalty to the state they serve. Dual citizens, by definition, have legal ties to two countries. In the case of ministers, heads of intelligence, or key negotiators, this dual allegiance can create a dilemma when national interests diverge. In essence, dual citizenship poses an inherent conflict of interest.  As the English proverb reads, “if you chase two rabbits, you catch none,” and its Somali counterpart echoes the same wisdom: “Ninkii laba faras isku fuula, dabada ayuu ka dilaacaa,”.  Both highlight the danger of divided focus, especially when loyalty is on the line. This dilemma becomes particularly pressing in the realm of governance. Consider this scenario: What happens when Somalia’s foreign policy directly contradicts the interests or policies of another nation with which a high-ranking official—who holds dual citizenship —is affiliated? In such cases, a profound ethical and political question arises: Where does their true allegiance lie? Will they align with Somalia, or will their decisions be influenced by other interests?

Dual citizenship can indeed create legal friction between countries. It can also hamper effective intelligence sharing, diplomatic negotiations and national security measures as dual citizens may be perceived as a liabilities by both states.  Put another way, there are instances where individuals who once held high-ranking government positions in one country, and simultaneously held citizenship in another, have faced arrest and prosecution.

A case in point is Mohamoud Thiam, the former Minister of Mines and Geology in Guinea, who also held U.S. citizenship. While serving in the Guinean government, he played a central role in awarding lucrative mining contracts. However, after completing his tenure, he returned to the U.S. and that’s where things took a turn.  In 2017, he was arrested and convicted of laundering millions of dollars in bribes he had received from Chinese companies eager to secure mining contracts in Guinea. His dual citizenship complicated the jurisdiction and enforcement of anti-corruption laws across borders.

In 2019, former Somali president Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo voluntarily renounced his US citizenship after two years into his tenure.   While the official announcement came without much detail, many analysts have read between the lines and suggest that his decision may have been prompted by repeated setbacks in attending the United Nations General Assembly in New York.  Despite being the head of state, his dual citizenship means he would be treated like any ordinary American citizen on U.S. soil, potentially opening the door to arrest or civil litigation.  This situation highlights how foreign governments might exploit dual citizenship status to exert pressure or influence.

Another telling example is Boris Johnson. By birth, Boris was an American citizen as he was born in New York City.  However, before stepping into the role of UK foreign secretary, he renounced his U.S.  citizenship. His reasons were twofold: taxes were the main driving force.  The United States is one of the few countries that taxes its citizens on their worldwide income, even if they’ve put down roots elsewhere. On top of that, political image was another key factor. Although the UK does allow dual nationals to climb the ranks to high government posts holding second passports, public trust can erode quickly if there is suspicion that national decisions are being compromised by conflicting loyalties. 

When it comes to accountability, holding two passports can be a slippery slope. Dual citizens in government can easily pack up and leave when the heat is on, dodging consequences that ordinary citizens must face head-on. This kind of escape route undermines the rule of law and weakens confidence in justice and governance.  Moreover, it can hinder the recovery of stolen assets and frustrate prosecution efforts.  

4. Lack of Local Understanding and Connection

While many dual citizens are highly educated and bring global experience to the table, they often fall short when it comes to deep cultural and grassroots understanding of Somalia’s day-to-day realities. Despite the fact that majority of the current generations of Somali leaders were born and raised in Somalia, some of them have not set foot in the country for nearly three decades. As a result, they are out of touch with local customs, traditions and the socio-economic hardships faced by ordinary Somali citizens.  This disconnect is more symbolic. It erodes public trust.  To put it bluntly, leadership is not merely about technical expertise or flashy credentials; it is about cultural literacy and a genuine, lively connection with the people one aspires to govern. 

There is an old Pan-Africanist expression that goes “Africa is only a cemetery for Africans” implying that many from the diaspora only return to the continent to seek high office or to be buried.  What is exceptional, however, is that diaspora expertise can truly be an asset, especially when it’s brought into civil service roles or technical positions that call for specialized experience. 

6. Global limits on dual citizens

Suspicion toward dual citizens is far from unique to Somalia; it’s a global phenomenon. Many countries with sizable diasporas, like Somalia, particularly those in post-conflict recovery or institutional fragility, have opted to lay down constitutional or legal restrictions on dual nationals holding high office.

Take our neighbor, Ethiopia, for instance. The country mandates that public officials must give up any other citizenship before assuming key governmental roles. Similarly, Rwanda restricts dual citizens from serving in sensitive areas such as the military and intelligence sectors. Looking further afield—this time to the Eastern Hemisphere—even advanced democracies like Australia require their parliamentarians to hold sole Australian citizenship to uphold the integrity of public office.

In light of these international precedents, Somalia—given its complex political landscape and delicate state-building process—arguably has even stronger justification for reserving top leadership positions for those with undivided allegiance. When national unity and trust are already fragile, allowing divided loyalties at the helm may open the door to deeper political fragmentation.

7. The Role of the Diaspora: Vital but Supportive

This article is by no means intended to diminish the immense value of the Somali diaspora. On the contrary, the diaspora has been indispensable in supporting Somalia’s recovery, consistently stepping up through remittances—estimated at 2.6 billion dollars in 2025—as well as through investment, technical expertise, and global advocacy.   

That said, it is both practical and wise that their role is focused on advisory, developmental and technical spheres, rather than occupying the helm of state power. After all, leadership, in a fragile and recovering stake like Somalia must be anchored in uncompromised loyalty, full-time engagement and permanent residence within the country.

Conclusion.

All things considered, while Somalia must continue to draw on the strengths and resources of its diaspora, it must also take a hard look at the potential risks that with the divided allegiance in top leadership roles. In a country still grappling with fragile institutions and security threats, every leader must stand up for national interests without the slightest doubt about where their loyalty lies. 

To put it plainly, one must understand that no one can serve two masters. To head off future conflicts of interest and safeguard national interests, it is time Somalia considers amending its constitution to restrict dual nationals from holding the highest offices unless they renounce their other citizenships. 

Recommendations.

• Somalia should amend its constitution to explicitly prohibit dual citizens from holding top government positions including the presidency, premiership, cabinet-level ministries and key security or intelligence roles unless they first renounce their foreign citizenship. 
• Implement robust vetting and background checks for candidates seeking high office to ensure compliance requirements and to detect potential conflicts of interest or hidden foreign ties. 
• Encourage highly skilled diaspora members to contribute in advisory, technical and capacity-building positions rather than in strategic decision-making roles, leveraging their expertise without compromising national sovereignty.
• Conduct comparative legal reviews to adopt tested legal models and best practices that balance diaspora engagement with strong protection of national interests.   

Mohamed Aidarus M.
Email: mohaidarus111@gmail.com

————
Reference

The Daily Beast. (2014, May 30). Is Iran’s Missing General, Ali Reza Asgari, Living in the United States? https://www.thedailybeast.com/is-irans-missing-general-ali-reza-asgari-living-in-the-united-states
Bloomberg. (2019, August 1). Somalia leader renounces U.S. citizenship amid Trump’s rhetoric. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-01/somalia-leader-renounces-u-s-citizenship-amid-trump-s-rhetoric

MoF, Federal Government of Somalia. (2024, October 23). 2025 Budget Policy FrameworkPaper.https://mof.gov.so/sites/default/files/Publications/FGS%20Budget%20Framework%20Paper%20for%20FY%202025%20revisedv15.pdf