Nairobi (WDN) — Remarks by Kenya’s Cabinet Secretary for Health, Aden Barre Duale, have ignited a fierce political debate, drawing strong reactions across the country—particularly among members of the Kikuyu community—after he accused previous Kenyan administrations of systematically discriminating against ethnic Somalis.

Speaking at a public event, Duale alleged that successive governments led by former Presidents Jomo Kenyatta and Mwai Kibaki deliberately denied thousands of young Kenyan Somalis access to national identity cards, effectively limiting their ability to fully participate in the country’s civic and economic life.

“Previous governments intentionally discriminated against Somalis by denying our youth national identity cards,” Duale said. “They should remember that Somalis are a nation of nearly 40 million people across the region, while they number only around three million and are confined within Kenya.”

The comments immediately triggered widespread criticism and intense public debate, with many Kenyans arguing that references to ethnic population size risk inflaming longstanding sensitivities surrounding identity and national cohesion.

Political observers noted that while historical grievances over citizenship documentation in Kenya’s North Eastern region have long been documented and debated, Duale’s choice of language has shifted attention away from the policy issue itself toward concerns over ethnic rhetoric.

The remarks have also prompted unease within sections of Kenya’s Somali community. Some community leaders warned that statements framed in ethnic terms could unintentionally expose Somali-owned businesses and communities to heightened political tensions at a time when national unity remains a sensitive issue.

Meanwhile, several traditional elders from Kenya’s North Eastern region echoed Duale’s broader criticism of past administrations, arguing that previous governments under Jomo Kenyatta, Daniel arap Moi, and Mwai Kibaki pursued policies that marginalized Kenyan Somalis because of their perceived political affinity with neighboring Somalia.

One elder claimed that during the Moi administration, local communities were warned that continued expressions of support for Somalia would invite severe government retaliation. According to the elder, officials even threatened to poison community water wells if such sentiments persisted—a claim that has not been independently verified.

The controversy has reopened discussion over one of Kenya’s most contentious historical issues: the long-standing complaints by many residents of the North Eastern region regarding delays and obstacles in obtaining national identity cards, a prerequisite for voting, employment, education, banking, and other public services.

Although recent governments have introduced reforms aimed at improving access to identity documents, the issue continues to resonate politically among many Kenyan Somalis, who view it as part of a broader legacy of historical exclusion.

As public debate intensifies, analysts caution that discussions about historical injustices require careful handling. While acknowledging legitimate grievances, they warn that framing such issues through ethnic comparisons risks deepening divisions rather than fostering reconciliation.

The Kenyan government has not issued an official statement addressing the controversy surrounding Duale’s remarks, but the comments have already become one of the country’s most widely discussed political issues, underscoring the enduring sensitivity of questions surrounding citizenship, equality, and national identity.

WardheerNews